Legal Opinion

Guy v. Baer

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 19, 1949PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtDeNNY, J.

After a careful consideration of the plaintiffs’ affidavit and application for an order to examine certain of the defendants in order to obtain information necessary to the preparation and filing of their complaint, we do not think the information sought is set forth with the particularity required by the statutes G-.S. 1-569-570, as construed by the decisions of this Court, or its materiality shown. Sudderth v. Simpson, 224 N.C. 181, 29 S.E. 2d 550; Washington v. Bus, Inc., 219 N.C. 856, 15 S.E. 2d 372; Knight v. Little, 217 N.C. 681, 9 S.E. 2d 377; Bohannon v. Trust Co., 210 N.C. 679, 188…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Bohannon v. Wachovia Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1936
  2. Bailey v. . MatthewsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1911
  3. Fields v. . ColemanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1912
  4. Knight v. . LittleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
  5. Smith v. . WoodingSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1917

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. WILLIAMS v. WILLIAMSDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API