Legal Opinion

Selvaggi v. Miron

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided November 7, 2000No. AC 20069PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

2Per curiam

In this appeal, the defendant Ann Miron1 claims that the trial court (1) incorrectly placed on her the burden of proving that any debt she owed to the plaintiffs, Michael Selvaggi and Monument Setting Company, Inc., was fully discharged and (2) improperly *601concluded that she was a partner in Lakeview Monument Company, whose business relations with the plaintiffs gave rise to the underlying collection action that led to this appeal. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

I

The defendant first claims that the court improperly placed on her the burden of proving that any debt she owed to…

3Cases cited9 opinions

  1. New England Savings Bank v. Bedford Realty Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
  2. Bennett v. Automobile InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
  3. Apuzzo v. HoerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1939
  4. Stanley v. M. H. Rhodes, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1954
  5. Granger v. A. Aiudi & SonsConnecticut Appellate Court · 2000

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by4 opinions

  1. Litchfield Asset Management Corp. v. HowellConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002
  2. Shapero v. MercedeConnecticut Appellate Court · 2003
  3. BRAFFMAN v. Bank of America Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
  4. Braffman v. Bank of America Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API