Legal Opinion

Apuzzo v. Hoer

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided February 7, 1939PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.

The amended substituted complaint in this action for groceries sold and delivered to the defendant, which went to the support of her family and for the general benefit of herself and her husband, alleges a net balance due of $1093.48, after crediting total payments of $541.85 up to January 25, 1932. The account is comprised of $200 due prior to a negotiable promissory note therefor dated March 14, 1927, $1357.73 due on twenty-three stated monthly items from March, 1928, to February, 1930, and $77.60 due on items evidenced by eleven checks described by date and amount received from October 17,…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Bell v. MorrisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1828
  2. Kallenbach v. DickinsonIllinois Supreme Court · 1881
  3. Clark v. SigourneySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1846
  4. Ryan v. ScanlonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1933
  5. Clark v. DiefendorfSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1929

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. New England Savings Bank v. Bedford Realty Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
  2. Zapolsky v. SacksSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
  3. Cadle Co. v. ErratoConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002
  4. Connecticut Society of Architects, Inc. v. Bank Building & Equipment Corp. of AmericaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1963
  5. Ozyck v. D'AtriSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API