Legal Opinion
Granger v. A. Aiudi & Sons
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided September 19, 2000No. AC 19192PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*38 Opinion
SCHALLER, J.
The plaintiffs1 appeal from the judgment of the trial court rendered following a trial to the court determining that the concrete business of the substitute defendant, A. Aiudi & Sons, LLC,2 does not constitute a nuisance and that the plaintiffs are not, therefore, entitled to an injunction. On appeal, the plaintiffs claim that the court improperly (1) concluded that the defendant’s operation is not a nuisance, (2) failed to issue an injunction in their favor on the basis of the defendant’s zoning violations and (3) burdened their constitutional rights of free association…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- State v. JarzbekSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- Briggs v. State Employees Retirement CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- Kostyal v. CassSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1972
- National Folding Box Co. v. City of New HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1959
- Advest, Inc. v. WachtelSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Giulietti v. GiuliettiConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
- State v. CuestaConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002
- Federal Deposit Insurance v. Mutual Communications Associates, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2001
- Reichenbach v. Kraska Enterprises, LLCConnecticut Appellate Court · 2008
- A. Aiudi & Sons, LLC v. Planning & Zoning CommissionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.