Legal Opinion

Blow v. Konetchy

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided May 20, 2008No. AC 28512PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

McLACHLAN, J.

The present appeal arises out of a quiet title action involving a driveway area between adjoining landowners. The plaintiff, Russell P. Blow, appeals from the judgment rendered by the trial court in favor of the defendant, Donald A. Konetchy. On appeal, the plaintiff claims that the court improperly (1) treated his claim as one of adverse possession and, as a result, applied a higher standard of proof, (2) found consent and used that as a basis for denying his prescriptive easement claim, (3) found that he had built his porch on the south side of his property line, (4)…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Lopinto v. HainesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
  2. Cadle Co. v. D'AddarioSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
  3. Smith v. MuellnerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
  4. Schulz v. SyvertsenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
  5. Winchester v. McCueConnecticut Appellate Court · 2005

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Stein v. TongConnecticut Appellate Court · 2009
  2. Kaplan v. ScheerConnecticut Appellate Court · 2018
  3. Czeczotka v. RoodeConnecticut Appellate Court · 2011
  4. Com. v. Lazrovitch, R.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
  5. Vering v. Groton Long Point Assn., Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API