Legal Opinion
Kaplan v. Scheer
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided June 12, 2018No. AC39515PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDiPENTIMA, C.J.
*490 *34 This case concerns a settlement agreement pursuant to which (1) the defendants, David Scheer and his wife, Tracy Scheer, granted the plaintiff, Patricia R. Kaplan, an easement for pedestrian and vehicular access to a portion of the plaintiff's driveway that lay on the defendants' property (driveway easement), and (2) the parties exchanged quitclaim deeds. The plaintiff now contends that these deeds were recorded in the wrong order and, as a result, her deed inadvertently conveyed to the defendants a different easement, one that previously had allowed her to cross the defendants' property to…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- International Multifoods Corporation v. Commercial Union Insurance Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002
- Miller v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
- Lopinto v. HainesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
- Greenwich Contracting Co. v. Bonwit Construction Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1968
- Katherine Mazzaferro, Joanne Malec, and Ruth Glahn v. Rli Insurance Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Assn. v. VirgulakConnecticut Appellate Court · 2019
- JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Assn. v. VirgulakConnecticut Appellate Court · 2019
- Kaplan v. ScheerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2018
- Pittu v. Bugaj Contractors Co., LLCConnecticut Appellate Court · 2025