Legal Opinion

Reiter v. Commonwealth

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 24, 1979No. 2351 C.D. 1977PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge Crumlish, Jr.,

The Governor1 and the Department of Justice of Pennsylvania, by preliminary objections, demur to a mandamus action instituted by Joseph H. Reiter. Reiter asks us to order the Department to reinstate him with back pay as Deputy Attorney General and to enjoin the Governor from future interference with Reiter’s employment.

We sustain the preliminary objections.

Did the Governor dismiss him without the consent and over the objection of the Attorney General arbitrarily, without cause, and without authority in law so as to support an action in mandamus?

Reiter’s complaint…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Scott v. Philadelphia Parking AuthoritySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
  2. Rosenthal v. RizzoCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1977
  3. Mahoney v. Philadelphia Housing AuthorityCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  4. Gwinn v. KaneSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  5. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Schofield v. LindsaySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Birdseye v. DriscollCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  2. Webb v. ThornburghCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  3. Birdseye v. DriscollCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  4. Roth v. McCoy, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Bucks County1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API