Legal Opinion

Roth v. McCoy

Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Bucks County

Decided January 24, 1989No. 87-003843Published

1Opinion of the Court

BORTNER, J.,

— Plaintiff has filed a motion for post-trial relief requesting this court to vacate the decree nisi pronounced on February 29, 1988. We hereby vacate said judgment for the reasons set forth below.

In January 1986, plaintiff, Edna M. Roth, Bristol Township executive, appointed defendant, Donald B. McCoy, Esq., as township solicitor. The appointment of Donald B. McCoy by Edna M. Roth was approved by the Bristol Township Council.

Subsequently, Roth became discontented with the legal advice McCoy provided Bristol Township. As a result of their deteriorating work relationship, Roth…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Ness v. MarshallCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1981
  2. Parsons v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  3. Kalaris v. DonovanCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1983
  4. Watson v. Pennsylvania Turnpike CommissionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
  5. American Federation of State, County & Municipal Employees v. ShappSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API