Mahoney v. Philadelphia Housing Authority
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Judge Mencer,
Plaintiffs in this assumpsit action are four former executive employes of the defendant, Philadelphia Housing Authority (PHA).1 All four plaintiffs had entered into the employ of defendant without any written agreement or contract as to the terms of their employment. *245Subsequently, the Board of Directors of PHA. adopted a personnel policy dealing with “the establishment and administration of a merit system or personnel practices which shall treat all employees of the Philadelphia Housing Authority in a reasonable and equitable manner.”
Essentially, as to the questions…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Perry v. SindermannSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Scott v. Philadelphia Parking AuthoritySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
- Mitchell v. Chester Housing AuthoritySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
- American Federation of State, County & Municipal Employees v. ShappSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
3Cited by38 opinions
- Brown v. TrenchCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1986
- Rosenthal v. RizzoCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1977
- Perri v. AytchCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1983
- Marino v. BowersCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1981
- Bolduc v. Board of SupervisorsCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.