Legal Opinion

Rosenthal v. Rizzo

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided May 25, 1977No. 76-2082PublishedCited by 75 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JAMES HUNTER, III, Circuit Judge:

This appeal presents claims of employee discharge in violation of the First and Fourteenth Amendments. The District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania entered summary judgment against the employee, Harold Rosenthal. We find no error in the disposition of the Fourteenth Amendment claim.1 We reverse and remand, however, as to the First Amendment claim for the following reasons.

Harold Rosenthal was appointed to a $14,257-a-year position as an Administrative Assistant II in the Commercial and Industrial Relocation Department of the Redevelopment…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Elrod v. BurnsSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Bishop v. WoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Poller v. Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
  4. Keyishian v. Board of Regents of Univ. of State of NYSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  5. Mahoney v. Philadelphia Housing AuthorityCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1974

3Cited by75 opinions

  1. Boyle v. County Of Allegheny PennsylvaniaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1998
  2. Ness v. MarshallCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1981
  3. Edward Nekolny, Patrick Dumas, and Maria L. Dahms v. Ann B. Painter, Individually and as Supervisor of Lyons Township, DefendantCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1981
  4. Karen Elmore v. Donald Cleary Eugene Turner Kenneth Naugle and Huntington TownshipCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2005
  5. Albert Flora, Jr. v. County of LuzerneCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2015

70 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API