Legal Opinion

Hearne v. Baker County

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided January 27, 1988No. LUBA 87-030; CA A46466PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRichardson, P. J.

Petitioner and respondent Dunn (respondent) both seek review of LUBA’s order affirming Baker County’s approval of the partition of respondent’s 20-acre tract, located in an exclusive farm use zone, into one 10-acre and two five-acre parcels and the county’s allowance of conditional use permits for nonfarm dwellings on the two smaller parcels. The county’s decision was made after LUBA had twice remanded previous approvals of the partition and the dwellings. See Smith v. Baker County, 14 Or LUBA 167 (1985); Hearne v. Baker County, 14 Or LUBA 743, aff’d 81 Or App 105, 724 P2d 351 (1986).

Because…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Mill Creek Glen Protection Ass'n v. Umatilla CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1987
  2. 1000 Friends v. Land Conservation & Development CommissionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1987
  3. Miles v. BD. OF COM'RS OF CLACKAMAS COUNTYCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980
  4. 1000 Friends v. Land Conservation & Development CommissionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1987

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Gurley v. KingCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2005
  2. Smith v. Clackamas CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API