Legal Opinion

1000 Friends v. Land Conservation & Development Commission

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided April 22, 1987No. LCDC 85-ACK-120; CA A37227PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*21RICHARDSON, P. J.

Petitioner and intervenor Mason seek review of LCDC’s order acknowledging Linn County’s comprehensive plan and land use regulations. We turn first to Mason’s contentions, which relate to LCDC’s approval of the county’s Freeway Interchange Commercial (FIC) designation of a 22-acre parcel owned by intervenor Ogden. Mason argues that the parcel is comprised predominantly of agricultural land and that the FIC designation would allow urban and non-agricultural uses which are not permissible on agricultural land under Goals 3,11 and 14.1

The county concluded that the Ogden parcel is…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. 1000 Friends of Oregon v. Wasco County CourtOregon Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Friends of Oregon v. LCDC (Curry Co.)Oregon Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Doughton v. Douglas CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1986
  4. 1000 Friends of Oregon v. Land Conservation & Development CommissionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1985
  5. 1000 Friends v. Land Conservation & Development CommissionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1986

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. 1000 Friends v. Land Conservation & Development CommissionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1988
  2. Hearne v. Baker CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1988
  3. 1000 Friends of Oregon v. Land Conservation & Development CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1987
  4. 1000 Friends v. Land Conservation & Development CommissionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API