Smith v. Clackamas County
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtRichardson, P. J.
Petitioner owns and conducts farming operations on a 54-acre parcel in an exclusive farm use zone. LUBA affirmed Clackamas County’s denial of his application to build a non-farm dwelling on a seven-acre part of that parcel. He seeks review and we affirm. The county made its decision under a provision of its zoning ordinance that parallels ORS 215.283(3)(d) 2 and denied the application on the basis of its conclusion that the proposed dwelling would not be situated on land that is generally unsuitable for the production of farm crops and livestock. The seven acres on which petitioner seeks to…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- 1000 Friends of Oregon v. Wasco County CourtOregon Supreme Court · 1985
- Meyer v. LordCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1978
- McCaw Communications, Inc. v. Marion CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989
- Flury v. Land Use Board of AppealsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1981
- Hopper v. Clackamas CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1987
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Von Lubken v. Hood River CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1990
- Clark v. Jackson CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1990
- Smith v. Clackamas CountyOregon Supreme Court · 1992
- Department of Land Conservation & Development v. Coos CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992