1000 Friends v. Land Conservation & Development Commission
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtRichardson, P. J.
Petitioner, intervenor Ogden and respondent LCDC each petition for reconsideration of our original opinion. We deny petitioner’s and Ogden’s petitions. We allow LCDC’s petition and modify our former opinion.
LCDC argues that we erred by sustaining petitioner’s fifth, sixth and seventh assignments of error, which challenged LCDC’s approval of the county’s decision not to impose regulations, independent of the Forest Practices Act, ORS 527.610 et seq, on commercial forest operations which the county identified as conflicting with various Goal 5 resources. After our original decision in this…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- 1000 Friends v. Land Conservation & Development CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1987
3Cited by2 opinions
- 1000 Friends v. Land Conservation & Development CommissionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1988
- Hearne v. Baker CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1988