Legal Opinion

Hansen v. Hevener

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 23, 1924No. Civ. No. 4318PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHouser, J.

In this action plaintiff sued for the specific performance of a contract to convey real property, or in the event that specific performance could not be had, for resultant damages.

‘The agreement of the parties was evidenced by certain escrow instructions by which “J. W. Hevener agrees to sell and Mrs. Renette Hansen agrees to purchase” the property in question for the sum of $2,700. The remainder of the escrow instructions which are here material and which were signed by all the parties were as follows:

“Escrow deposit herewith $50.00. Additional cash $450.00 on May 24, 1921, and on or before…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Spect v. SpectCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Haffey v. . LynchNew York Court of Appeals · 1894
  3. Jones v. CortesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1861
  4. Thompson v. LaughlinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  5. Morgan v. DibbleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Pascoe v. MorrisonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
  2. Lathrop v. GaugerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
  3. Cushing v. LeviCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
  4. Bonney v. PettyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
  5. Milkes v. SmithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API