Milkes v. Smith
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
VALLÉE, J.
Plaintiffs and defendant about November 12, 1945, entered into a contract in writing consisting of escrow instructions whereby defendant agreed to sell and plaintiffs agreed to buy a parcel of real property for $4,250. Plaintiffs forthwith deposited $4,250 with the escrow holder. Defendant refused to perform and cancelled his instructions. Hence, this action for specific performance or, in the alternative, for damages.
At the trial it developed that defendant was the owner of an interest in the property acquired as a result of its sale for nonpayment of delinquent taxes. It also…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- King v. StanleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
- Smith v. BanghamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
- Easton v. MontgomeryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Miller v. DyerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Quarg v. ScherCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Carpenter v. FolkertsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1981
- Friedrich v. RolandCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
- D-K Investment Corp. v. SutterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
- Walgren v. DolanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
- Levy v. WolffCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.