Legal Opinion

Menominee Water Co. v. City of Menominee

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 5, 1900PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Case made from Menominee; Stone, J. Assumpsit by the Menominee Water Company against the city of Menominee for rent of certain fire hydrants. There was a judgment for defendant, and plaintiff assigns error.

1Opinion of the CourtLong, J.

This action was brought by the plaintiff to recover from the defendant city a balance due for rent of certain public fire hydrants, and for the supplying of water therefrom, from May 1, 1897, to November 1, 1897, in the sum of $1,920.84, and from November 1, 1897, to May 1, 1898, in the sum of $1,925, and interest. The action is based upon a contract between the city and plaintiff, arising out of certain ordinances of the city and the acceptance thereof by the plaintiff. The declaration contains a single special count upon the contract. The plea is the general issue, with notice under it,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Putnam v. City of Grand RapidsMichigan Supreme Court · 1885
  2. Ludington Water-Supply Co. v. City of LudingtonMichigan Supreme Court · 1899
  3. Niles Water Works v. Mayor of NilesMichigan Supreme Court · 1886
  4. Monroe Water Co. v. HeathMichigan Supreme Court · 1897

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. North Michigan Water Co. v. City of EscanabaMichigan Supreme Court · 1917
  2. Attorney General ex rel. Graves v. Mayor of AdrianMichigan Supreme Court · 1910
  3. Attorney General v. BruceMichigan Supreme Court · 1921
  4. Belding Land & Improvement Co. v. City of BeldingMichigan Supreme Court · 1901
  5. Alpena City Water Co. v. City of AlpenaMichigan Supreme Court · 1902

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API