Niles Water Works v. Mayor of Niles
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Berrien. (Smith, J.) Assumpsit. Plaintiff brings error. The facts are stated in the opinions.
1Opinion of the CourtCampbell, C. J.
This action was brought to recover for the price of furnishing hydrants and water to the city of *314Niles. All of the bills presented were under a written contract, and for the contract price. The defense allowed at the circuit was the illegality of the contract.
This contract was one made in 1878 with Solon L. Wiley, plaintiff's assignor, whereby he was to have exclusive privileges .of supplying water from Barron lake for thirty years, -and of laying mains and pipes for that purpose. The city agreed to use at least fifty hydrants a year, at the price of fifty dollars a year, making an annual…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- City of Detroit v. Michigan Paving Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1877
- City of Detroit v. RobinsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1878
3Cited by23 opinions
- City Council v. Dawson Waterworks Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1899
- State ex rel. White v. BarkerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1902
- Saleno v. City of NeoshoSupreme Court of Missouri · 1895
- Heino v. City of Grand RapidsMichigan Supreme Court · 1918
- Toomey v. Norwood Realty Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1955
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.