Legal Opinion

Alpena City Water Co. v. City of Alpena

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided May 19, 1902No. Docket No. 2PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Error to Alpena; Emerick, J. Assumpsit by the Alpena City Water Company against the city of Alpena to recover money paid for taxes. From a judgment for plaintiff on verdict directed by the court, defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtMontgomery, J.

In 1878 the common council of the defendant city adopted a resolution declaring it to be expedienteo have constructed in the city waterworks, for the purpose of supplying the city and the inhabitants thereof with water, and that it was inexpedient for the city itself to build such works. Following upon this, and on the 14th of October, 1878, a contract was entered into with the plaintiff, by the terms of which the plaintiff undertook to construct and maintain a system of waterworks in the city, and to furnish water to the city at certain stated prices; and section 9 of the contract is, in…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Ludington Water-Supply Co. v. City of LudingtonMichigan Supreme Court · 1899
  2. Menominee Water Co. v. City of MenomineeMichigan Supreme Court · 1900

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Cane v. City and County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
  2. City of Parkersburg v. Baltimore & O. R.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1923
  3. Portland Water Co. v. Town of PortlandSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1922
  4. City of Parkersburg v. Baltimore & O. R.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1923

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API