Attorney General v. Bruce
Michigan Supreme Court
Certiorari to Ingham; Wiest (Howard), J. Mandamus by Alex. J. Groesbeck, attorney general, to compel Helmer Bruce, supervisor of Bark River township, to spread and levy a tax. From an order granting the writ, defendant brings certiorari.
1Opinion of the CourtStone, J.
This case has been brought here by certiorari to review a proceeding by mandamus in the circuit court for the county of Ingham, upon the petition of the attorney general, to compel the defendant, as supervisor of Bark River township, Delta county, to spread and levy a tax of $9,315.27 for the purpose *535of enabling the township to pay into the treasury of the State the sum expended by the State in repairing a State rewarded highway in the township. It appears that the road was constructed by the township/ and reward was paid thereon, during the years 1909 to 1912, all proceedings being taken…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Williams v. EgglestonSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
- Anway v. Grand Rapids Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1920
- People v. HanrahanMichigan Supreme Court · 1889
- State ex rel. Bulkeley v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1896
- Loomis v. RogersMichigan Supreme Court · 1917
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Gunther v. Board of County Road CommissionersMichigan Supreme Court · 1923
- Fitzsimons & Galvin, Inc. v. RogersMichigan Supreme Court · 1928
- Longstreet v. County of MecostaMichigan Supreme Court · 1924
- City of Dearborn v. Michigan Turnpike AuthorityMichigan Supreme Court · 1955
- Binkley v. HughesTennessee Supreme Court · 1934
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.