Legal Opinion

Sallan Jewelry Co. v. Bird

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 3, 1927No. Docket No. 63PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBird, J.

Plaintiff Woodward owns a store build ing in the city of Pontiac. His tenant is plaintiff Sallan Jewelry Company. Defendants own an adjoining store. Each owns half of the dividing party wall. A stairway leading to the second story was constructed many years ago by the side of the party wall, but wholly on defendants’ premises. At the second story, openings and doorways were constructed in the party wall leading to plaintiff’s! second story, and plaintiff Woodward claims that he and his predecessors in title have used the stairway and 'helped to keep it in repair since the year 1867. Recently…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Maxwell v. Bay City Bridge Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1879
  2. Ward v. WardMichigan Supreme Court · 1877
  3. Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railway Co. v. MarbleMichigan Supreme Court · 1897
  4. First National Bank v. Vanden BrooksMichigan Supreme Court · 1918
  5. Wilson v. WilsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1858

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Kitchen v. KitchenMichigan Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Zollinger v. FrankUtah Supreme Court · 1946
  3. Groshean v. Dillmont Realty Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1932
  4. Haab v. MoormanMichigan Supreme Court · 1952
  5. Beechler v. ByerlyMichigan Supreme Court · 1942

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API