Legal Opinion

Ward v. Ward

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 2, 1877PublishedCited by 23 opinions

Error to Wayne. Assumpsit ; framed issue. The facts are in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtGraves, J.

The plaintiff in error is a son and the defendant in error a sister of the late Eber B. Ward, and the present controversy relates to a claim preferred by Miss Ward against her brother’s estate and which her nephew contests. The claim was originally heard before the commissioners appointed to adjudicate on such matters pursuant to the statute, and was allowed against the estate February 3d, 1876, at $31,798.88. The plaintiff in error took an appeal to the circuit court where an issue was framed and tried before a jury, and a verdict given and judgment entered for the claimant against the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Burton v. DriggsSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
  2. Cliquot's ChampagneSupreme Court of the United States · 1866
  3. Gilbert v. KennedyMichigan Supreme Court · 1871
  4. Elwood v. DeifendorfNew York Supreme Court · 1848
  5. Murphy v. . People of the State of N.Y.New York Court of Appeals · 1876

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Rivard v. RivardMichigan Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Detzur v. B. Stroh Brewing Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1899
  3. Southworth Co. v. LambSupreme Court of Missouri · 1884
  4. Orr v. RodeSupreme Court of Missouri · 1890
  5. Advertiser & Tribune Co. v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1880

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API