Cahill v. Pine Creek Oil Co.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from County Court, Ohmulgee Co'untyj Geo. A. Johns, Judge. Action by S. D. Cahill and others against the Pine Creek Oil Company and others. Judgment for defendants, and plaintiffs bring error.
1Opinion of the Court
PEE CITBIAM.'
This case presents error from the county court of Okmulgee county, and is an action of .forcible entry and detainer brought by the plaintiffs in error, plaintiffs below, ■against defendants in error, defendants below, before a justice of the peace in Okmulgee county, to recover the possession of a tract of land described as the northeast one-quarter of section 35, township 13 N., range 14 E., situate in said county. The trial before the justice resulted in a judgment for the defendants, and the plaintiffs appealed to the county court. A. trial was entered upon in the county…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- McDonald v. StilesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1898
- Armour Packing Co. v. HoweSupreme Court of Kansas · 1901
- Conaway v. GoreSupreme Court of Kansas · 1882
- City of Oklahoma City v. HillSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1896
- Chisholm v. WeiseSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1897
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Taylor v. StanfordArizona Supreme Court · 1966
- Herzog v. the Texas CompanyMontana Supreme Court · 1930
- Antonio Messer D/B/A Tony's Laundry & Dry Cleaners v. Virgin Islands Urban Renewal Board Appeal of Antonio MesserCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1980
- Casey v. KitchensSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
- Deninger Et Ux. v. GossomSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.