Legal Opinion
In Re Powell
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided October 21, 2004No. 02-BG-701PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Per curiam
In a 1998 reciprocal discipline proceeding for the negligent misappropriation of client funds in Maryland, we suspended the respondent, Robert D. Powell, from the practice of law in the District of Columbia for six months with a fitness requirement. See In re Powell, 646 A.2d 340 (D.C.1994). During the pendency of that proceeding, respondent was also administratively suspended from practicing in this jurisdiction for non-payment of dues. Respondent has neither been reinstated from the administrative suspension, nor sought reinstatement from the reciprocal suspension.
On June 13, 2002,…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- In Re GoldsboroughDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1995
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. PowellCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2002
- In Re PowellDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1994
3Cited by10 opinions
- In Re DobbynDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2008
- In Re ReedDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2008
- In re NeebDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2009
- In re SteinbergDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2008
- In Re JafroodiDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2008
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.