Legal Opinion
In Re Reed
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided June 5, 2008No. 07-BG-88PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Per curiam
In this reciprocal disciplinary proceeding, the Board on Professional Responsibility has recommended that this court impose discipline identical in all material respects 1 to the discipline ordered by the Supreme Court of Arizona. Specifically the Board has proposed that Reed be suspended from practice in the District of Columbia for three years and that he be required to demonstrate fitness as a condition of reinstatement. Although Bar Counsel urged the Board to recommend disbarment, he now takes no exception to the recommended discipline. Reed has not participated in the proceedings in this…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- In Re GoldsboroughDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1995
- In Re ZilberbergDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1992
- In Re SlosbergDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1994
- In Re SpannDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1998
- In Re ChildressDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2002
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Ramey v. District of Columbia Department of Employment ServicesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2010
- In re Sherryl V.R.S. Goffer a/k/a Sherryl Snodgrass CaffeyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2015