Legal Opinion
In re Neeb
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided January 22, 2009No. Bar Registration No. 449075; No. 08-BG-1298PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
2Per curiam
On further consideration of the certified copy of the order issued by the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania suspending respondent by consent for one year and one day coupled with a fitness requirement, See Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Kimberly Neeb, no.1149 Disciplinary Docket No. 3 October 13, 2006, this court’s November 12, 2008, order suspending respondent from the practice of law pending final disposition by this court, the December 17, 2008, Statement Regarding Reciprocal Discipline from Bar Counsel recommending a one year and one day suspension with a fitness requirement, and…
3Cases cited4 opinions
- In Re SumnerDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2000
- In Re PowellDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2004
- In Re ReynoldsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2000
- In re ColemanDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2007
4Cited by2 opinions
- In Re DigiovanniDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2010
- In Re KrainDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2010