State v. Sandoval
New Mexico Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SERNA, Justice.
{1} The district court sentenced Defendant Anthony Sandoval as a habitual offender based on three prior felony convictions. Defendant appealed his sentence to the Court of Appeals on the ground that it violated the requirement in Rule 5 — 604(B)(1) NMRA 2003 that the habitual criminal proceeding be commenced within six months of arraignment. The Court of Appeals reversed, holding that the district court lacked authority to grant a petition to extend the time for commencement of trial once the six month time period under Rule 5-604 expired. State v. Sandoval,…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- United States v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
- State v. AragonNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1990
- State v. FloresNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1982
- Hayes v. StateNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1988
- In re Michael L.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 2002
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- State v. BennettNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2003
- State v. DominguezNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2007
- Duran v. EichwaldNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2009
- State v. LovatoNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2007
- State v. MorelandNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2007
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.