Legal Opinion
In re Michael L.
New Mexico Court of Appeals
Decided May 30, 2002No. 22,174PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CASTILLO, Judge.
{1} Once again we are asked to review the effect of Rule 10-230.1(B) NMRA 2002 on an order entered more than ninety days after the filing of the motion to reconsider a child’s disposition under the Children’s Code. In this case, the children’s court invited the motion to reconsider, told the child that reconsideration would occur if three conditions were met, and included the conditions in the disposition order. Further, there was no showing that the Child was less than diligent in obtaining the information necessary for determination, and the State does not contest on…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Helman v. GallegosNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1994
- State v. Jonathan M.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1990
- State v. EdenNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1989
- State v. StrandIdaho Supreme Court · 2002
- State v. WilsonNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1998
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Allen v. LeMasterNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2011
- Roark v. Farmers Group, Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 2007
- State v. GutierrezNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2006
- Gates v. State, Taxation & Revenue DepartmentNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2007
- State v. SandovalNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2003
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.