State v. Moreland
New Mexico Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
VIGIL, Judge.
{1} The State appeals from an order of the district court granting Defendant a new trial, asserting: (1) the district court had no jurisdiction to grant Defendant’s motion, and (2) if it did have jurisdiction, the district court abused its discretion. We affirm. Since other rulings of the district court may or may not be repeated on retrial, we do not address them in this appeal.
FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
{2} Defendant and his live-in fiancee injected themselves with methamphetamine. While both of them were intoxicated from the drug, she said Defendant attacked her…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- State v. RowellNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1995
- State v. WoodwardNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1995
- State v. BalderamaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2004
- State v. VolpatoNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1985
- State v. MorrisNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1961
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. MorelandNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2008
- State v. AcostaNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2015
- State v. MorelandNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2007
- State v. AcostaNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2015
- State v. GarciaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2013