Rhoades v. State
Idaho Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
HORTON, Justice.
This is a consolidated appeal from orders issued by the district courts dismissing Petitioners’ successive petitions for post-conviction relief. In those petitions, accompanied by petitions for writ of habeas corpus and motions to correct an illegal sentence, Petitioners asked that their sentences of death be vacated and that they be granted new sentencing trials. Petitioners Paul Rhoades, Randy McKinney, Gerald Pizzuto, David Card, James Hairston and Gene Stuart (collectively referred to as Petitioners) ask this Court to retroactively apply Ring v. Arizona, 536 U.S. 584,122…
2Cases cited82 opinions
- Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Teague v. LaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Ring v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Griffith v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Atkins v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
77 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by41 opinions
- State v. PerryIdaho Supreme Court · 2010
- State v. Azad Haji AbdullahIdaho Supreme Court · 2015
- State v. Dameniel Preston OwensIdaho Supreme Court · 2015
- State v. DraperIdaho Supreme Court · 2011
- Coeur d'Alene Tribe v. Lawerence DenneyIdaho Supreme Court · 2015
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.