Legal Opinion

Empress Casino Joliet Corp. v. Giannoulias

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided June 5, 2008No. 104586, 104587, 104590 consPublishedCited by 44 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Burke

Chief Justice Thomas and Justices Freeman, Fitzgerald, Kilbride, Garman, and Karmeier concurred in the judgment and opinion.

OPINION

In this case, we are asked to determine the constitutionality of Public Act 94 — 804 (the Act), which imposed, for a two-year period beginning on the effective date of the amendatory Act, a 3% surcharge on the four riverboat casinos in Illinois that had adjusted gross receipts (AGR) of over $200 million in the calendar year 2004. The remaining five riverboat casinos, all of which had AGRs below $200 million, were not subject to the surcharge. The Act provided that…

2Cases cited42 opinions

  1. Vance v. BradleySupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Carmichael v. Southern Coal & Coke Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
  3. Brushaber v. Union Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  4. Eastern Enterprises v. ApfelSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  5. Best v. Taylor MacHine WorksIllinois Supreme Court · 1997

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. Empress Casino Joliet Corpora v. Balmoral Racing Club, IncorporCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2016
  2. Empress Casino Joliet Corp. v. Balmoral Racing Club, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2011
  3. Star Equipment, Ltd. v. State of Iowa, Iowa Department of TransportationSupreme Court of Iowa · 2014
  4. Empress Casino Joliet Corpora v. John JohnstonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2014
  5. Moline School District v. QuinnIllinois Supreme Court · 2016

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API