Legal Opinion

Barrett v. Rodgers

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided November 20, 1990PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNolan, J.

This case requires us once again to mark out the contours of the exclusivity provision of the Workers’ Compensation Act, G. L. c. 152, §§ 23, 24 (1988 ed.). Specifically, we must determine whether an individual may successfully sue her employer for damages incurred in a single incident through an instrumentality owned by the employer, but unrelated to the employer’s business. We hold that she may not recover against her employer, and, therefore, we affirm the judgment of the court below.

The plaintiff, Lydia Barrett, has brought an action against the defendant, Ronald Rodgers, for injuries…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Duprey v. ShaneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Gurry v. Cumberland Farms, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1990
  3. Guy v. Arthur H. Thomas Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Schweiner v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1984
  5. Longever v. Revere Copper & Brass Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1980

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Kamaka v. Goodsill Anderson Quinn & StifelHawaii Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Massachusetts Highway Department v. American Federation of State, Council 93Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1995
  3. Payne v. Galen Hospital Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Robidoux v. MuhollandCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2011
  5. Braga v. Genlyte Group, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2005

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API