Legal Opinion

Guy v. Arthur H. Thomas Co.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided July 19, 1978No. 77-1330PublishedCited by 59 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Loches,, J.

The issue before this court is whether the remedy under the Ohio Workers’ Compensation Law (R. C. Chapter 4123) is exclusive as to an employer’s liability. Appellant does not contend that she has an action against appellee hospital for the original compensable injury, but does assert that her action against the appellee hospital for malpractice is not prohibited by R. C. 4123.74. In her first proposition of law, appellant argues that where, as in the instant cause, the employer occupies a second or dual capacity that confers obligations unrelated to and independent of those upon it…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Reed v. the YakaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Cudahy Packing Co. Of Nebraska v. ParramoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
  3. Duprey v. ShaneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
  4. Sebek v. Cleveland Graphite Bronze Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1947
  5. Marlow v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1967

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by59 opinions

  1. Bell v. Industrial Vangas, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1981
  2. McGee v. Goodyear Atomic Corp.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1995
  3. D'Angona v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Panaro v. Electrolux Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
  5. Payne v. Galen Hospital Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 2000

54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API