Legal Opinion
Shogren v. Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific Railroad
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided March 5, 1986No. Civ. No. 4-85-428PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
DIANA E. MURPHY, District Judge.
Plaintiff Duwane L. Shogren brought this personal injury action against defendants Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul and Pacific Railroad Company (the railroad), O. Robert Nelson, and A. Burton Curtiss. Jurisdiction is alleged under the Federal Employers’ Liability Act (FELA), 45 U.S.C. §§ 51-60, and pendent jurisdiction. The railroad and the individual defendants have asserted crossclaims against each other for indemnity and/or contribution. The railroad also asserted a crossclaim against the individual defendants for property damage.…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Burnett v. New York Central RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Aldinger v. HowardSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- DeMaio v. Consolidated Rail CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1980
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Leland L. Lockard, Lynette Lockard v. Missouri Pacific Railroad Company, a Corporation, Rosella Ray D/B/A Rosella Ray's Boarding House. Leland L. Lockard, Lynette Lockard v. Missouri Pacific Railroad Company, a Corporation, Rosella Ray D/B/A Rosella Ray's Boarding HouseCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1990
- Tersiner v. Union Pacific RailroadDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1990
- Stinefelt v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1987
- Lockard v. Missouri Pacific RailroadCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1990
- Lockard v. Missouri Pacific RailroadCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1990
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.