Legal Opinion
DeMaio v. Consolidated Rail Corporation
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided May 14, 1980No. 79 Civ. 4468PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
KNAPP, District Judge.
Plaintiff, having instituted an action under the Federal Employers’ Liability Act (“FELA”) 45 U.S.C. § 51 et seq. against his employer, Consolidated Rail Corporation (“Conrail”), seeks to amend his complaint to name as defendants three other parties claimed to be jointly responsible with Con rail for the injuries suffered. One of these parties, Dennis Friends, a citizen of the same state as plaintiff, opposes the motion on the ground that the court lacks subject matter jurisdiction over the suit between him and plaintiff. For reasons that follow we…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Owen Equipment & Erection Co. v. KrogerSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Burnett v. New York Central RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Aldinger v. HowardSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
3Cited by17 opinions
- Leland L. Lockard, Lynette Lockard v. Missouri Pacific Railroad Company, a Corporation, Rosella Ray D/B/A Rosella Ray's Boarding House. Leland L. Lockard, Lynette Lockard v. Missouri Pacific Railroad Company, a Corporation, Rosella Ray D/B/A Rosella Ray's Boarding HouseCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1990
- Tersiner v. Union Pacific RailroadDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1990
- Lee Construction Co. v. Federal Reserve Bank of RichmondDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1982
- Potter v. Rain Brook Feed Co., Inc.District Court, E.D. California · 1982
- Cheltenham Supply Corp. v. Consolidated Rail Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1982
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.