Legal Opinion
Aldinger v. Howard
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided June 24, 1976No. 74-6521PublishedCited by 945 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Rehnquist
This case presents the “subtle"and complex question with far-reaching implications,” alluded to but not answered in Moor v. County of Alameda, 411 U. S. 693, 715 (1973), and Philbrook v. Glodgett, 42117. S. 707, 720 (1975): whether the doctrine of pendent jurisdiction extends to confer jurisdiction over a party as to whom *3no independent basis of federal jurisdiction exists. In this action, where jurisdiction over the main, federal claim against various officials of Spokane County, Wash., was grounded in 28 U. S. C. § 1343 (3), the Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit held that pendent…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Monroe v. PapeSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Osborn v. Bank of United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
- Moor v. County of AlamedaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Hurn v. OurslerSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by945 opinions
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Pennhurst State School and Hospital v. HaldermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Exxon Mobil Corp. v. Allapattah Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Owen Equipment & Erection Co. v. KrogerSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- In Re Pacor, Inc. v. John Higgins, Jr. And Louise HigginsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1984
940 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.