Lockard v. Missouri Pacific Railroad
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
1Concurring in part, dissenting in partBeam, Circuit Judge
I concur in the result reached by the majority with regard to the inconsistent jury verdicts. I disagree with its speculation that the jury intended to apportion total damages of $800,000 between the two defendants. I believe, however, that the judgments are susceptible to reconciliation under rules of law available to the district court.
I dissent with regard to the majority holding on the issue of pendent party jurisdiction.
The district court entered judgment on both the federal and the state claims before *306the United States Supreme Court decided Finley v. United States, — U.S. -, 109 S.Ct.…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Owen Equipment & Erection Co. v. KrogerSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Aldinger v. HowardSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Zahn v. International Paper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Finley v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.