Brown v. National American University
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
GORDON W. SHUMAKER, Judge.
Relator challenges the decision by the commissioner’s representative that she is disqualified from receiving unemployment benefits because she was discharged for employment misconduct. Relator, who was discharged for borrowing money from respondent university’s adult students, argues that under the 2002 statutory definition she did not commit employment misconduct. Because we look to the date an employee was discharged rather than the day or days on which the employment misconduct occurred to determine which statutory definition applies, we apply the 2003…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Schmidgall v. FilmTec Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2002
- Lolling v. Midwest PatrolSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1996
- Auger v. Gillette Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
- Tuff v. Knitcraft Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1995
- Scheunemann v. Radisson South HotelCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1997
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Munro Holding, LLC v. CookCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2005
- Jeremy Tubbs, Relator v. Minnesota Department of Human Services, Department of Employment and Economic DevelopmentCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2014