Legal Opinion

Subsequent Injury Fund v. Baker

Court of Special Appeals of Maryland

Decided October 11, 1978No. 1008, September Term, 1977PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMason, J.

The sole issue we are concerned with on this appeal is whether the doctrine of res judicata precluded the Workmen’s Compensation Commission (Commission) from reopening and modifying its award to Appellee, Dorothy J. Baker, 1 against the Subsequent Injury Fund (Fund), Appellant.

On October 4, 1973, Carlton Baker sustained a fracture of his right arm in the course of his employment. While in the hospital for treatment of this injury it was discovered that he had multiple myeloma, a form of bone cancer, which antedated the accidental injury. As a result of this pre-existing condition the Fund was…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. MPC, Inc. v. KennyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1977
  2. White v. Prince George's CountyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1978
  3. Alvey v. AlveyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1961
  4. Bartlett Hayward Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
  5. United Dredging Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Murray International Freight Corp. v. GrahamCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1989
  2. Vest v. Giant Food Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1993
  3. Potomac Abatement, Inc. v. SanchezCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2012
  4. Waters v. Pleasant Manor Nursing HomeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2000
  5. Jung v. Southland Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1998

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API