Taylor v. Lieffort
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WILLIS, Judge.
Appellant Robb Taylor challenges the district court’s denial of his petition for a writ of habeas corpus, arguing that the district court erred (1) in concluding that his right against self-incrimination had not been violated and (2) in finding that Taylor refused to participate in a sex-offender treatment program. We affirm.
FACTS
Taylor was convicted of fourth-degree criminal sexual conduct and was sentenced to serve 30 months in prison. Pursuant to prison policy, Taylor received a psychological evaluation and was directed to complete a sex-offender treatment program.…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Lefkowitz v. TurleySupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- State v. ImlayMontana Supreme Court · 1991
- MacE v. AmestoyDistrict Court, D. Vermont · 1991
- Gilfillen v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1991
- Russell v. EavesDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 1989
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Morrow v. LaFleurSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1999
- State v. KaquatoshCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1999
- Northwest v. LaFleurCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1998
- In Re the Welfare of T.C.J.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2004
- Johnson v. FabianCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2006
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.