Legal Opinion

Taylor v. Lieffort

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided August 26, 1997No. C1-97-338PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

WILLIS, Judge.

Appellant Robb Taylor challenges the district court’s denial of his petition for a writ of habeas corpus, arguing that the district court erred (1) in concluding that his right against self-incrimination had not been violated and (2) in finding that Taylor refused to participate in a sex-offender treatment program. We affirm.

FACTS

Taylor was convicted of fourth-degree criminal sexual conduct and was sentenced to serve 30 months in prison. Pursuant to prison policy, Taylor received a psychological evaluation and was directed to complete a sex-offender treatment program.…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Lefkowitz v. TurleySupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. State v. ImlayMontana Supreme Court · 1991
  3. MacE v. AmestoyDistrict Court, D. Vermont · 1991
  4. Gilfillen v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Russell v. EavesDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 1989

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Morrow v. LaFleurSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1999
  2. State v. KaquatoshCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1999
  3. Northwest v. LaFleurCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1998
  4. In Re the Welfare of T.C.J.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2004
  5. Johnson v. FabianCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2006

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API