Legal Opinion

In Re the Welfare of T.C.J.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided December 14, 2004No. A04-202PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

LANSING, Judge.

The district court denied certification of TCJ’s assault charges and, following designation as an extended-juvenile-jurisdiction (EJJ) prosecution, a jury found TCJ guilty of third-degree assault and not guilty of first-degree assault. On appeal from the third-degree assault conviction, TCJ challenges the jury composition, evidentiary rulings, jury instructions, sufficiency of the evidence, and that part of his disposition that stays an adult sentence. We affirm the district court’s rulings and instructions that underlie TCJ’s adjudication but, to comport with…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Crane v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Lewis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  4. State v. WebbSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
  5. State v. RussellSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1991

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. In Re the Welfare of S.J.T.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2007
  2. In Re the Welfare of D.D.R.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2006
  3. In Re Welfare of J.L.P.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2006
  4. State of Minnesota v. Quintin Lynn ThomasCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2016
  5. In Re the Welfare of D.D.R.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2006

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API