Legal Opinion

State v. Kaquatosh

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided September 28, 1999No. C4-99-970PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

NORTON, * Judge.

The trial court revoked appellant Mike Kaquatosh’s probation when he failed to complete court-ordered sex-offender treatment because he refused to admit to a treatment counselor that he had committed the sex offense underlying the conviction from which he is appealing. Kaquatosh contends the trial court’s action violated his Fifth Amendment privilege against compelled self-incrimination and was an abuse of discretion. We agree, and reverse and remand to the trial court so that it can delete from the probation order the requirement that Ka-quatosh admit the facts…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Minnesota v. MurphySupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Maness v. MeyersSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. State v. AustinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
  4. United States v. Frierson, JeromeCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1991
  5. MacE v. AmestoyDistrict Court, D. Vermont · 1991

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Johnson v. FabianSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2007
  2. Dzul v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2002
  3. State v. EvansOhio Court of Appeals · 2001
  4. Ainsworth v. RisleyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2001
  5. In Re the Welfare of S.J.T.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2007

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API