Northwest v. LaFleur
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CRIPPEN, Judge.
In this appeal from the trial court’s denial of his habeas corpus petition, appellant David Northwest disputes a disciplinary confinement determination based on his failure to successfully complete sex offender treatment. Contending that the discipline violates his substantive due process rights, appellant argues that it was improper to force his admission of two offenses after he was permitted in court to enter Alford pleas, whereby appellant accepted convictions on two crimes without admitting that they occurred. We affirm the trial court’s conclusion that there need…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- In Re BlodgettSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1994
- State v. BehlSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1997
- Arcadia Development Corp. v. City of BloomingtonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1996
- State Ex Rel. Holecek v. RossCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1991
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Bronson Health Care Group Inc v. Titan Insurance CompanyMichigan Court of Appeals · 2016
- State Ex Rel. Guth v. FabianCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2006
- Johnson v. FabianCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2006
- State Ex Rel. Marlowe v. FabianCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2008
- State Ex Rel. Peterson v. FabianCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2010
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.