Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Morrow v. LaFleur

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided April 15, 1999No. C7-98-323PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

LANCASTER, J.

This appeal presents the issues of whether the Commissioner of Corrections violated respondent Randy Morrow’s due process rights or privilege against self-incrimination by imposing a disciplinary sanction for failing to participate in and complete a sex offender treatment program. The case comes to us on the Commissioner’s appeal of a decision of the court of appeals which reversed the district court’s denial of Morrow’s petition for writ of habeas corpus and concluded that the Commissioner violated Morrow’s due process rights and his Fifth Amendment privilege against…

2Cases cited41 opinions

  1. Turner v. SafleySupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  2. Greenholtz v. Inmates of the Nebraska Penal & Correctional ComplexSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Fisher v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Minnesota v. MurphySupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. South Dakota v. NevilleSupreme Court of the United States · 1983

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. State v. Iowa District Court for Webster CountySupreme Court of Iowa · 2011
  2. State v. SchwartzSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2001
  3. Johnson v. FabianSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2007
  4. In re P.T.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2003
  5. State v. KaquatoshCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1999

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API