Lewis v. Southern California Edison Co.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
GRIFFIN, J., pro tem.
The above-entitled action, Luvada, R. Lewis v. Southern California Edison Company and Harry Plotz, was an action brought by appellants for the wrongful death of Henry E. Lewis, husband of Luvada R. Lewis and father of Mary Lewis. The action entitled ‘ ‘ City of Los Angeles v. Southern California Edison Company and Harry Plotz” was an action brought by the City of Los Angeles against respondents under the provisions of the Workmen’s Compensation Law to recover a lien on any judgment rendered in favor of appellants Luvada R. Lewis and Mary Lewis by reason of an award…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Green v. SouleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- Kauffman v. MaierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- Harrison v. Sutter Street RailwayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- Bates v. HowardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
- Biaggi v. RamontCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Aced v. Hobbs-Sesack Plumbing Co.California Supreme Court · 1961
- Tice v. Kaiser Co.California Court of Appeal · 1951
- Lucerne Country Club v. BealCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
- Piru Citrus Assn. v. WilliamsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
- Hawkinson v. OesdeanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.