Harbel Oil Co. v. Steele
Arizona Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
LA PRADE, Chief Justice.
On June 12, 1956, this court ordered the dismissal of the pending appeal in this case upon the ground that the appeal had not been timely perfected. Harbel Oil Co. v. Steele, 80 Ariz. 368, 298 P.2d 789. The facts as therein set forth are correct and need not be restated.
Upon the authority of the holdings in Sligh v. Watson, 67 Ariz. 95, 191 P.2d 724, and Fagerberg v. Denny, 57 Ariz. 188, 112 P.2d 581, and the fuller and correct analysis of the applicable rules relating to entry of judgment as set forth in the dissenting opinion in the case as originally reported, it is…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Harbel Oil Company v. SteeleArizona Supreme Court · 1956
- Sligh v. WatsonArizona Supreme Court · 1948
- Fagerberg v. DennyArizona Supreme Court · 1941
3Cited by11 opinions
- Black v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1957
- Harbel Oil Co. v. Superior Court of Maricopa CountyArizona Supreme Court · 1959
- Jackson v. Sears, Roebuck and Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1957
- Bergman v. BergmanCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1965
- Harbel Oil Company v. SteeleCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1965
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.