Legal Opinion

Fagerberg v. Denny

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided April 21, 1941No. Civil No. 4274PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLockwood, C. J.

Counsel for plaintiff herein has moved to dismiss the appeal on the ground that it was not taken in time. The motion is late hut counsel justifiably excuses it by pointing out that until our decision in Southwestern Freight Lines, Ltd., et al., v. Norma Shafer et al., ante, p. 111, 111 Pac. (2d) 625, the trial bench and the bar were not certain as to just when, under the new rules, the time for taking an appeal began to run.

Upon an examination of the record it appears that on February 5, 1940, the trial judge made his written decision in Yuma county and transmitted the same to the clerk of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Southwestern Freight Lines, Ltd. v. ShaferArizona Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Brewer v. MorganArizona Supreme Court · 1928

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Harbel Oil Company v. SteeleArizona Supreme Court · 1956
  2. Harbel Oil Co. v. SteeleArizona Supreme Court · 1956
  3. Sligh v. WatsonArizona Supreme Court · 1948
  4. Gillespie Land & Irrigation Co. v. Buckeye Irr. Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1950
  5. Harbel Oil Co. v. SteeleArizona Supreme Court · 1956

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API