Legal Opinion

Jackson v. Sears, Roebuck and Co.

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided September 30, 1957No. 6392PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STRUCKMEYER, Justice.

Appellee, as plaintiff in the court below, .sued Clarence O. Jackson, appellant herein, on the balance due on an account. Trial was duly had before the Court sitting without a jury and on the 18th day of May, 1955, the trial judge wrote a letter to the Clerk of Court of Maricopa County stating in part as follows: “You will please let the record show that judgment be entered for the plaintiff * * * from date * * This letter was received by the Clerk on the following day, but no order was entered on the civil docket until May 31, 1955. The notation in the civil docket…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. State v. HaneySupreme Court of Missouri · 1955
  2. Harbel Oil Company v. SteeleArizona Supreme Court · 1956
  3. Los Angeles County Bank v. RaynorCalifornia Supreme Court · 1882
  4. Evans v. City of American FallsIdaho Supreme Court · 1932
  5. Lowther v. DavisWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1889

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Chester, Blackburn & Roder, Inc. v. MarcheseDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1980
  2. Cattle Nat. Bank & Trust Co. v. WatsonNebraska Supreme Court · 2016
  3. Kemble v. PorterArizona Supreme Court · 1960
  4. Lamb v. SUPERIOR COURT, ETC.Arizona Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Jackson v. American Credit Bureau, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1975

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API