Legal Opinion

Harbel Oil Company v. Steele

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided June 12, 1956No. 6155PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

UDALL, Justice.

Horace Steele, et al., as appellees, filed a motion in the above-entitled case to dismiss the appeal filed by Harbel Oil Company, a corporation, because it was not taken in time. A ruling on this motion, it appears to us, will be determinative of the appeal. The narrow question presented involves an interpretation of our rules of civil procedure. It is a matter of considerable importance and is one of first impression, hence we deem it advisable to dispose of same by a written decision rather than merely making a minute order as is customarily done.

The relevant facts, which are…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Barth v. County of ApacheArizona Supreme Court · 1917
  2. Southwestern Freight Lines, Ltd. v. ShaferArizona Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Sligh v. WatsonArizona Supreme Court · 1948
  4. United States v. Moore Et UxCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1950
  5. In Re Gipson's EstateArizona Supreme Court · 1946

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Edwards v. YoungArizona Supreme Court · 1971
  2. State v. ShawArizona Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Murphey v. GrayArizona Supreme Court · 1958
  4. Ritchie v. Grand Canyon Scenic RidesArizona Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Jenney v. Arizona Express, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 1961

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API