Harbel Oil Company v. Steele
Arizona Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
UDALL, Justice.
Horace Steele, et al., as appellees, filed a motion in the above-entitled case to dismiss the appeal filed by Harbel Oil Company, a corporation, because it was not taken in time. A ruling on this motion, it appears to us, will be determinative of the appeal. The narrow question presented involves an interpretation of our rules of civil procedure. It is a matter of considerable importance and is one of first impression, hence we deem it advisable to dispose of same by a written decision rather than merely making a minute order as is customarily done.
The relevant facts, which are…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Barth v. County of ApacheArizona Supreme Court · 1917
- Southwestern Freight Lines, Ltd. v. ShaferArizona Supreme Court · 1941
- Sligh v. WatsonArizona Supreme Court · 1948
- United States v. Moore Et UxCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1950
- In Re Gipson's EstateArizona Supreme Court · 1946
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Edwards v. YoungArizona Supreme Court · 1971
- State v. ShawArizona Supreme Court · 1963
- Murphey v. GrayArizona Supreme Court · 1958
- Ritchie v. Grand Canyon Scenic RidesArizona Supreme Court · 1990
- Jenney v. Arizona Express, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 1961
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.