Sligh v. Watson
Arizona Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
LA PRADE, Justice.
Plaintiffs below (appellants here) instituted their action for breach of contract and prayed for money damages in the sum of $1,000. Defendants (appellees) denied that they were indebted to plaintiffs on account of the matters complained of in the complaint, and prayed that plaintiffs take nothing thereby.
Both parties moved for summary judgment on the pleadings and on the affidavits filed in opposition to defendants’ motion, which were presented and considered by the court, whereupon the court granted defendants’ motion and decreed that they should have their costs. In view…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Southwestern Freight Lines, Ltd. v. ShaferArizona Supreme Court · 1941
- McGirk v. Seventy-Six Cattle Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1931
- Fagerberg v. DennyArizona Supreme Court · 1941
3Cited by9 opinions
- Ingalls v. NeidlingerArizona Supreme Court · 1950
- Harbel Oil Company v. SteeleArizona Supreme Court · 1956
- Arizona Department of Economic Security v. HallCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1978
- Harbel Oil Co. v. SteeleArizona Supreme Court · 1956
- Jackson v. Pacific Investment Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1963
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.